STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR vs HAREENDRANADH G Advocate - T Jayakrishnan, HORMIS ABRAHAM, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,Akhil S Ranjit,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,Akhil S Ranjit,PADMANABHAN,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,Akhil S Ranjit,PADMANABHAN,T Jayakrishnan, — 45/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 94, 151 ,Order 41, rule 5. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLAL100002362025

Filing Number

177/2025

Filing Date

07-Oct-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 94, 151 ,Order 41, rule 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR

    Adv. Radhakrishnan. G

  2. 2.TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE CHERTHALA

    Adv. Radhakrishnan. G

  3. 3.VILLAGE OFFICER EZUPUNNA

    Adv. Radhakrishnan. G

  4. 4.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (NH) DIVISION PWD CHERTHALA

    Adv. Radhakrishnan. G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HAREENDRANADH G Advocate - T Jayakrishnan, HORMIS ABRAHAM, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,Akhil S Ranjit,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,Akhil S Ranjit,PADMANABHAN,, HORMIS ABRAHAMSABU DINESH. K,BAIJU. M. V,LEKHA S,ANANTHALAKSHMY S,Akhil S Ranjit,PADMANABHAN,T Jayakrishnan,

  2. 2.NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

  3. 3.THE SECRETARY EZUPUNNA GRAMPANCHAYATH

    Adv. AMBILI. P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  3. 21-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  13. 31-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  14. 24-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  16. 12-Dec-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Order

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    For L C R

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  19. 11-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  21. 05-Nov-2025

    Order

    The Sub Judge of Cherthala allowed the State of Kerala's petition to condone a 248-day delay in filing an appeal against a decree in an original suit, finding the delay was caused by the case file going missing from the government pleader's office without willful negligence or dilatory tactics. The court granted the petitioner an opportunity to contest the matter for meritorious disposal, relying on the principle that courts should favor applicants when explanations don't suggest mala fides, and ordered costs in favor of the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 05-Nov-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  23. 04-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  24. 30-Oct-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  25. 28-Oct-2025

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  26. 21-Oct-2025

    Return of notice

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  27. 08-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 07-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub Judge of Cherthala allowed the State of Kerala's petition to condone a 248-day delay in filing an appeal against a decree in an original suit, finding the delay was caused by the case file going missing from the government pleader's office without willful negligence or dilatory tactics. The court granted the petitioner an opportunity to contest the matter for meritorious disposal, relying on the principle that courts should favor applicants when explanations don't suggest mala fides, and ordered costs in favor of the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case