State of Kerala Police vs Sachin — 100618/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,308,294(b),34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 232 CR.PC on 17th March 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLAL100002102024

Case disposed

Filing Number

100047/2024

Filing Date

24-05-2024

Registration No

100618/2024

Registration Date

01-06-2024

Court

Sub Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 232 CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

1966

Police Station

Cherthala Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,308,294(b),34
Crl.mp(ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section SachinState of Kerala Police

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha

Respondent(s)

Sachin

Vineeth

Akhil

Lohith @ Hukes

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

For Examination of Witness

12-03-2026

For Examination of Witness

25-02-2026

Repeat Summons

19-02-2026

Judge on leave / duty

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The court acquitted all four accused (Sachin S, Vineeth, Akhil KD, and Lohith) under Section 232 CrPC of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 294(b), and 308 r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The key reasoning was that the injured witness (PW1) and occurrence witnesses failed to support the prosecution's case, denying knowledge of the assailants and refusing to identify the accused, making it impossible for the prosecution to prove the allegations of assault with a stone weapon at a beverage shop in Cherthala on December 10, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted all four accused (Sachin S, Vineeth, Akhil KD, and Lohith) under Section 232 CrPC of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 294(b), and 308 r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The key reasoning was that the injured witness (PW1) and occurrence witnesses failed to support the prosecution's case, denying knowledge of the assailants and refusing to identify the accused, making it impossible for the prosecution to prove the allegations of assault with a stone weapon at a beverage shop in Cherthala on December 10, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Cherthala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case