Noushad vs Vijayakrishnan Advocate - JOHN VARGHESE — 38/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26. Status: For settlement. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

For settlement Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL100001802025

Filing Number

190/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

38/2025

Registration Date

01-Aug-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Noushad

    Adv. Rajkamal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayakrishnan Advocate - JOHN VARGHESE

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    For settlement

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Judge on traing programme

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS.38/2025 - Noushad v. Vijayakrishnan Advocate Outcome: The petition for attachment before judgment was allowed with costs. The court attached the property in dispute for Rs. 20 lakhs to secure the petitioner's claim. Key Facts: Noushad paid Rs. 20 lakhs as advance consideration under a sale agreement dated 22.08.2024 to purchase property from Vijayakrishnan for Rs. 1,60,000 per cent. The sale did not proceed because nearby property owners objected to the petitioner's intended concrete block manufacturing unit, citing pollution concerns. The petitioner sought attachment of the property after learning the respondent intended to transfer it to defeat any judgment in his favor. Reasoning: The court found that while the respondent held the advance amount and the contract's forfeiture clause required adjudication, permitting property alienation before trial would cause irreparable hardship to the petitioner, who has provided a convincing reason for non-performance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Verify and report

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  11. 03-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  15. 15-Nov-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  17. 03-Nov-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  18. 31-Oct-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  19. 22-Oct-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  20. 17-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  21. 07-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  22. 12-Sep-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  23. 02-Aug-2025

    Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  24. 01-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS.38/2025 - Noushad v. Vijayakrishnan Advocate Outcome: The petition for attachment before judgment was allowed with costs. The court attached the property in dispute for Rs. 20 lakhs to secure the petitioner's claim. Key Facts: Noushad paid Rs. 20 lakhs as advance consideration under a sale agreement dated 22.08.2024 to purchase property from Vijayakrishnan for Rs. 1,60,000 per cent. The sale did not proceed because nearby property owners objected to the petitioner's intended concrete block manufacturing unit, citing pollution concerns. The petitioner sought attachment of the property after learning the respondent intended to transfer it to defeat any judgment in his favor. Reasoning: The court found that while the respondent held the advance amount and the contract's forfeiture clause required adjudication, permitting property alienation before trial would cause irreparable hardship to the petitioner, who has provided a convincing reason for non-performance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case