KADAKKARAPPALLY PADINJARE KOTTARAM NSS KARAYOGAM NO. 1608 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY vs NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR Advocate - Ratheesh — 21/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLIII RULE 1. Status: Return of notice. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Return of notice Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLAL100001652025

Filing Number

185/2025

Filing Date

26-Jul-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

26-Jul-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLIII RULE 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KADAKKARAPPALLY PADINJARE KOTTARAM NSS KARAYOGAM NO. 1608 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

    Adv. T Jayakrishnan

  2. 2.P.KRISHNAKUMARJI

    Adv. T Jayakrishnan

  3. 3.PURUSHOTHAMA KURUP

    Adv. T Jayakrishnan

  4. 4.M.SOMAN

    Adv. T Jayakrishnan

  5. 5.KANNAN.H

    Adv. T Jayakrishnan

  6. 6.SUNILKUMAR.P

    Adv. T Jayakrishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR Advocate - Ratheesh

  2. 2.CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

    Adv. Ratheesh

  3. 3.CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

    Adv. Ratheesh

  4. 4.CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT

    Adv. Ratheesh

  5. 5.CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REG.NO. 967, RREPRESENTED BY ITS UNION INSPECTOR

    Adv. Ratheesh

  6. 6.MOHANAN NAIR

    Adv. Ratheesh

  7. 7.ADVOCATE C.MADHU

    Adv. Ratheesh

  8. 8.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR

    Adv. Ratheesh

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Return of notice

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Return of notice

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Judge on traing programme

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  9. 25-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    For L C R

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  11. 26-Aug-2025

    Return of notice

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Return of notice

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  15. 05-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  16. 05-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CMA No. 21/2025 Outcome: Ad-interim injunction petition DISMISSED. The court found petitioners not entitled to an injunction restraining the NSS Registrar's supersession order. Notice issued to remaining respondents for final hearing on merits. Key Facts: Elected committee members of an NSS Karayogam challenged the Registrar's order appointing an ad-hoc committee on 18.06.2025, alleging arbitrary supersession. The ad-hoc committee had already assumed full control before the suit was filed on 19.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 05-Aug-2025

    Return of notice

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  18. 04-Aug-2025

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  19. 01-Aug-2025

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  21. 28-Jul-2025

    Objection

    Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

  22. 26-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 26-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA No. 21/2025 Outcome: Ad-interim injunction petition DISMISSED. The court found petitioners not entitled to an injunction restraining the NSS Registrar's supersession order. Notice issued to remaining respondents for final hearing on merits. Key Facts: Elected committee members of an NSS Karayogam challenged the Registrar's order appointing an ad-hoc committee on 18.06.2025, alleging arbitrary supersession. The ad-hoc committee had already assumed full control before the suit was filed on 19.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case