KADAKKARAPPALLY PADINJARE KOTTARAM NSS KARAYOGAM NO. 1608 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY vs NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR Advocate - Ratheesh — 21/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLIII RULE 1. Status: Return of notice. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLAL100001652025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
185/2025
Filing Date
26-07-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
26-07-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KADAKKARAPPALLY PADINJARE KOTTARAM NSS KARAYOGAM NO. 1608 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
Adv. T Jayakrishnan
P.KRISHNAKUMARJI
Adv. T Jayakrishnan
PURUSHOTHAMA KURUP
Adv. T Jayakrishnan
M.SOMAN
Adv. T Jayakrishnan
KANNAN.H
Adv. T Jayakrishnan
SUNILKUMAR.P
Adv. T Jayakrishnan
Respondent(s)
NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR Advocate - Ratheesh
CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
Adv. Ratheesh
CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
Adv. Ratheesh
CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT
Adv. Ratheesh
CHERTHALA TALUK NSS UNION REG.NO. 967, RREPRESENTED BY ITS UNION INSPECTOR
Adv. Ratheesh
MOHANAN NAIR
Adv. Ratheesh
ADVOCATE C.MADHU
Adv. Ratheesh
P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR
Adv. Ratheesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
Return of notice
Return of notice
Disposed
Judge on traing programme
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Return of notice |
| 27-03-2026 | Return of notice |
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judge on traing programme |
| 12-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CMA No. 21/2025 Outcome: Ad-interim injunction petition DISMISSED. The court found petitioners not entitled to an injunction restraining the NSS Registrar's supersession order. Notice issued to remaining respondents for final hearing on merits. Key Facts: Elected committee members of an NSS Karayogam challenged the Registrar's order appointing an ad-hoc committee on 18.06.2025, alleging arbitrary supersession. The ad-hoc committee had already assumed full control before the suit was filed on 19.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMA No. 21/2025 Outcome: Ad-interim injunction petition DISMISSED. The court found petitioners not entitled to an injunction restraining the NSS Registrar's supersession order. Notice issued to remaining respondents for final hearing on merits. Key Facts: Elected committee members of an NSS Karayogam challenged the Registrar's order appointing an ad-hoc committee on 18.06.2025, alleging arbitrary supersession. The ad-hoc committee had already assumed full control before the suit was filed on 19.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts