Padmini Gopinath vs The Secretary Advocate - JAYASREE. D — 100152/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26OrderVIIRule1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL100000982009
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100152/2009
Filing Date
29-09-2009
Registration No
100152/2009
Registration Date
29-09-2009
Court
Sub Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Padmini Gopinath
Adv. SHENOY. V. L
Renu Paliyathu
Adv. Sri.V.L Shenoy
Shylaja Pathiyal
Adv. Sri.V.L Shenoy
Respondent(s)
The Secretary Advocate - JAYASREE. D
Nanada Kumar
Adv. JAYASREE. D
Usha Rajalekshmi
Lekha R
Radhakrishnan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For Defendent Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 07-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 30-03-2026 | For Defendent Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Court dismissed the interim application (IA 5/2024) filed by the plaintiffs seeking details of deposits made in an old land acquisition reference case (LAR 71/1964) from the Sub Court, Alappuzha. The court held that the deposit details from the concluded reference case have no connection to the merits of the present suit for declaration and injunction, and the petitioners can approach the relevant court directly if needed. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court dismissed the interim application (IA 5/2024) filed by the plaintiffs seeking details of deposits made in an old land acquisition reference case (LAR 71/1964) from the Sub Court, Alappuzha. The court held that the deposit details from the concluded reference case have no connection to the merits of the present suit for declaration and injunction, and the petitioners can approach the relevant court directly if needed. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts