State Of Kerala vs Tankappan Achari — 100024/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderXLIrule1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLAL100000742024
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-02-2024
Filing Number
100069/2024
Filing Date
04-03-2024
Registration No
100024/2024
Registration Date
04-03-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Kerala
Adv. Radhakrishnan. G
Thahsildar
Adv. Radhakrishnan. G
Village Officer
Adv. Radhakrishnan. G
Respondent(s)
Tankappan Achari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
FOR HEARING
Judge on traing programme
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | Judge on traing programme |
| 12-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 01-12-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case 100024/2024 Summary: The State of Kerala's petition to condone a 70-day delay in filing an appeal against the October 28, 2023 judgment in OS.531/2018 was allowed. The Sub Judge found sufficient grounds for condonation, as the delay resulted from administrative reasons while seeking District Collector's permission, which was not willful. The respondent (Tankappan Achari) raised no serious objection, and the court granted the State an opportunity to contest the appeal on merits. Costs were awarded to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 100024/2024 Summary: The State of Kerala's petition to condone a 70-day delay in filing an appeal against the October 28, 2023 judgment in OS.531/2018 was allowed. The Sub Judge found sufficient grounds for condonation, as the delay resulted from administrative reasons while seeking District Collector's permission, which was not willful. The respondent (Tankappan Achari) raised no serious objection, and the court granted the State an opportunity to contest the appeal on merits. Costs were awarded to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts