Naveen Jayasankar vs Alpa Jayasankar Advocate - PREMKUMAR. K — 100008/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S37(2). Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL100000372023

For hearing on IA

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

100040/2023

Filing Date

20-02-2023

Registration No

100008/2023

Registration Date

20-02-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section S37(2)
Ia/23/2025 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Alpa Jayasankar
Ia/24/2025 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Alpa Jayasankar
Ia/25/2025 Classification : Direction Petition Section Naveen JayasankarAlpa Jayasankar
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Application to Appoint Receiver Section Alpa JayasankarNaveen Jayasankar
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Application for Direction to Produce Documents Section Alpa JayasankarNaveen Jayasankar
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section Alpa JayasankarNaveen Jayasankar
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Application for Attachment Section Alpa JayasankarNaveen Jayasankar
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Alpa JayasankarNaveen Jayasankar
Ia/6/2026 Classification : Direction Petition Section Naveen JayasankarAlpa Jayasankar
Ia/7/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Alpa JayasankarNaveen Jayasankar
Ia/8/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Naveen Jayasankar
Ia/9/2026 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section Naveen JayasankarAlpa Jayasankar
Ia/10/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Alpa Jayasankar

Petitioner(s)

Naveen Jayasankar

Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN. T

Parvathi Ashok

Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN. T

Respondent(s)

Alpa Jayasankar Advocate - PREMKUMAR. K

Rani

Ajithkumar

Adv. Arun Chand

Subi Sagarika

Geetha Rani, Pupa

Devan, Pupa

Anjali, Pupa

Omanakkuttan

Adv. M.P.Gopinathan Memorial Stadium

V.S.Lal Sanitary

Raveendran

Paul Issac

Subramonian

Tomy,

M/s Maliyekkal Agencies,

Johny

M.M.Nias, Advocate

CITU Bhavan

Sindhu.S.Nair

Benni.S

Dhanush Krishna.S.Kammath

dinesh Sreeenivasan.

Adv. JYOTHISHKUMAR. P. S

Shakeer

Sasi

Adv. Manu Sankar

Moni

Adv. Ravichandran

Suresh

Vijesh

Adv. TOM ISAAC

Ullas Kumar

Dhanush

Moni

Gopalakrishnan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

08-04-2026

For hearing on IA

07-04-2026

Orders in IA

06-04-2026

Orders in IA

04-04-2026

Judge on leave / duty

01-04-2026

For hearing on IA

Interim Orders

04-12-2024
Order
27-08-2024
Order
05-01-2026
Final Order
20-02-2023
Final Order
20-02-2023
Final Order
02-07-2025
Final Order
12-10-2023
Final Order
17-08-2023
Final Order
08-04-2026
Order
08-04-2026
Order
08-04-2026
Order

Court Order Summary Case: IA.19/2025 in OS.8/2023 | Sub Judge Court, Cherthala | 8 April 2026 Outcome: The petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking arrest and detention of tenants for willful disobedience of a court order to deposit rent has been dismissed without costs. The court held that the earlier order directing tenants to deposit rent was merely directive in nature, intended to facilitate payment and safeguard all parties' interests, not punitive. Rent disputes are ordinarily governed by the Rent Control Act, and treating non-payment as willful disobedience in partition proceedings is not sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: IA.19/2025 in OS.8/2023 | Sub Judge Court, Cherthala | 8 April 2026 Outcome: The petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking arrest and detention of tenants for willful disobedience of a court order to deposit rent has been dismissed without costs. The court held that the earlier order directing tenants to deposit rent was merely directive in nature, intended to facilitate payment and safeguard all parties' interests, not punitive. Rent disputes are ordinarily governed by the Rent Control Act, and treating non-payment as willful disobedience in partition proceedings is not sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cherthala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case