State of Kerala (Ambalapuzha Police) vs Gopinathan Nair Advocate - SASIDHARAN NAIR P — 701182/2018
Case under Police Act (kerala) Section 118(a),119(a). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 21st April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL090042502018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
704243/2018
Filing Date
01-12-2018
Registration No
701182/2018
Registration Date
01-12-2018
Court
JFCM, Ambalapuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1571
Police Station
Ambalapuzha Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Ambalapuzha Police)
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Ambalappuzha
Respondent(s)
Gopinathan Nair Advocate - SASIDHARAN NAIR P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 10-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 31-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 27-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Ambalapuzha First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Gopinadhan Nair of charges under Kerala Police Act Sections 118(a), 119(a), and IPC Section 353, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined there was insufficient evidence of intoxication, no credible proof of sexual gestures degrading women's dignity, and mere abusive language alone does not constitute assault or obstruction of a public servant's duty. Material discrepancies regarding the incident date further undermined the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Ambalapuzha First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Gopinadhan Nair of charges under Kerala Police Act Sections 118(a), 119(a), and IPC Section 353, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined there was insufficient evidence of intoxication, no credible proof of sexual gestures degrading women's dignity, and mere abusive language alone does not constitute assault or obstruction of a public servant's duty. Material discrepancies regarding the incident date further undermined the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts