State of Kerala (Police) vs SAJITH — 700366/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 153,427,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL090018062020

Case disposed

Filing Number

703175/2020

Filing Date

01-07-2020

Registration No

700366/2020

Registration Date

01-07-2020

Court

JFCM, Ambalapuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

447

Police Station

Punnapra Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 153,427,34
Crl.MP/2456/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section State of Kerala (Police)
Crl.MP/2457/2025 Classification : Warrant Recall Petition Section State of Kerala (Police)

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala (Police)

Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Ambalappuzha

Respondent(s)

SAJITH

SAJESH

SREEKUTTAN

HARIKUTTAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order/Judgement

07-03-2026

FOR HEARING

13-02-2026

FOR HEARING

14-01-2026

Await Records

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The Ambalapuzha First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused persons Sajith, Sajesh, and Harikuttan of charges under Sections 153 and 427 IPC (rioting and mischief) for allegedly destroying election campaign posters on April 9, 2019. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case because all material witnesses, including the complainant, turned hostile and denied witnessing the incident or identifying the accused. Accused Sreekuttan's charge was abated as he was reported deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Ambalapuzha First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused persons Sajith, Sajesh, and Harikuttan of charges under Sections 153 and 427 IPC (rioting and mischief) for allegedly destroying election campaign posters on April 9, 2019. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case because all material witnesses, including the complainant, turned hostile and denied witnessing the incident or identifying the accused. Accused Sreekuttan's charge was abated as he was reported deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFCM, Ambalapuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case