State of Kerala Police vs MATHUKUTTY MATHAYI VAVACHAN — 700320/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),334(1). Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED on 09th March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL090009552025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

955/2025

Filing Date

19-03-2025

Registration No

700320/2025

Registration Date

19-03-2025

Court

JFCM, Ambalapuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1145

Police Station

Punnapra Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),334(1)
Crl.MP/1698/2025 Classification : Section MATHUKUTTY MATHAYI VAVACHANState of Kerala Police

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Ambalappuzha

Respondent(s)

MATHUKUTTY MATHAYI VAVACHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

09-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

For production of accused

23-02-2026

Remand Extended

09-02-2026

Issue bailable warrant to witness

02-02-2026

Remand Extended

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026

Judgement

Interim Orders

08-08-2025
Order

SUMMARY: The Court dismissed the bail petition of accused Mathukutty Mathai, who was charged with temple theft and criminal trespass (BNS Sections 303(2), 334(1)) for stealing ₹15,000 and damaging offering boxes worth ₹25,000. The court rejected bail on self-bond, citing that the accused is a habitual offender with prior criminal antecedents, is currently serving a sentence in another case, and poses risks of witness intimidation and committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Court dismissed the bail petition of accused Mathukutty Mathai, who was charged with temple theft and criminal trespass (BNS Sections 303(2), 334(1)) for stealing ₹15,000 and damaging offering boxes worth ₹25,000. The court rejected bail on self-bond, citing that the accused is a habitual offender with prior criminal antecedents, is currently serving a sentence in another case, and poses risks of witness intimidation and committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFCM, Ambalapuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case