Alleppey hill Produce Trading and Processing Co Ltd vs Omaana K M Advocate - V.VIJAYAKUMAR — 659/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED on 27th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL090008902017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
874/2017
Filing Date
21-03-2017
Registration No
659/2017
Registration Date
21-03-2017
Court
JFCM, Ambalapuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alleppey hill Produce Trading and Processing Co Ltd
Adv. SIVADAS B
Respondent(s)
Omaana K M Advocate - V.VIJAYAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
For further hearing
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/Judgement | |
| 19-03-2026 | For further hearing | |
| 11-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Ambalapuzha Judicial Magistrate convicted Omana KM under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 99,500 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had proven the cheque's execution and issuance to discharge a legally enforceable debt, and the accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence, despite claiming the cheque was given merely as security. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and ordered to pay Rs. 1,53,230 as compensation to the complainant, with one month additional imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Ambalapuzha Judicial Magistrate convicted Omana KM under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 99,500 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had proven the cheque's execution and issuance to discharge a legally enforceable debt, and the accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence, despite claiming the cheque was given merely as security. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and ordered to pay Rs. 1,53,230 as compensation to the complainant, with one month additional imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts