State of Kerala Police vs Muraleedharan — 600916/2019
Case under Ipc \ Section 447,324. Status: Repeat Summons. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL070116132019
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
606624/2019
Filing Date
31-10-2019
Registration No
600916/2019
Registration Date
31-10-2019
Court
JFCM II, Alappuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha
FIR Details
FIR Number
761
Police Station
Mararikulam Police Station
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor II (Mobile), Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
Muraleedharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha
Repeat Summons
Show casue to Investigating Officer
For evidence
For evidence
No sitting notified
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Repeat Summons |
| 28-04-2026 | Show casue to Investigating Officer |
| 18-04-2026 | For evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | For evidence |
| 21-02-2026 | No sitting notified |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for discharge filed by accused Muraleedharan under Section 239 CrPC has been dismissed. The court found sufficient prima facie materials in wound certificates and police body notes documenting acid burn injuries sustained by the two victims, corroborated by their Section 161 statements. Despite the accused's claims of enmity-based false registration, the court determined that the evidence was adequate to proceed with charges under IPC Sections 324 and 447, particularly since charges were already framed in 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition for discharge filed by accused Muraleedharan under Section 239 CrPC has been dismissed. The court found sufficient prima facie materials in wound certificates and police body notes documenting acid burn injuries sustained by the two victims, corroborated by their Section 161 statements. Despite the accused's claims of enmity-based false registration, the court determined that the evidence was adequate to proceed with charges under IPC Sections 324 and 447, particularly since charges were already framed in 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts