Binu Antony vs Salimraj Advocate - UMASANKAR. P — 600104/2020

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Status: For evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL070025202020

For evidence

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

601296/2020

Filing Date

19-08-2020

Registration No

600104/2020

Registration Date

19-08-2020

Court

JFCM II, Alappuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138
Crl.MP/1942/2025 Classification : Section Salimraj
Crl.MP/2157/2025 Classification : Section Binu AntonySalimraj
Crl.MP/2158/2025 Classification : Section Binu AntonySalimraj
Crl.MP(Ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Binu Antony
Crl.MP(Ab)/2/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Salimraj

Petitioner(s)

Binu Antony

Adv. PRIYADARSAN THAMPI. G

Respondent(s)

Salimraj Advocate - UMASANKAR. P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha

06-04-2026

For evidence

16-03-2026

Defence Evidence

09-03-2026

Defence Evidence

23-02-2026

For Defendent Evidence

16-02-2026

Defence Evidence

Interim Orders

11-12-2023
Judgement

SUMMARY: The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha convicted accused Salimraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing two dishonored cheques (₹3,00,000 and ₹7,00,000) in 2020 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to three months simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10,00,000, with an additional one month imprisonment in default of fine payment. The fine amount, if recovered, shall be paid to the complainant as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha convicted accused Salimraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing two dishonored cheques (₹3,00,000 and ₹7,00,000) in 2020 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to three months simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10,00,000, with an additional one month imprisonment in default of fine payment. The fine amount, if recovered, shall be paid to the complainant as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFCM II, Alappuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case