State of Kerala Police vs Suraj Gogoi — 600656/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 333,126(2),115(2),74. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 12th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL070020122024
Filing Number
602010/2024
Filing Date
06-11-2024
Registration No
600656/2024
Registration Date
06-11-2024
Court
JFCM II, Alappuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
905
Police Station
Mararikulam Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor II (Mobile), Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
Suraj Gogoi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Alappuzha
Disposed
Call on
Defence Evidence
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Call on |
| 07-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 03-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 24-02-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Alappuzha First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Suraj Gogoi of charges under sections 333, 126(2), 115(2), and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (assault, wrongful restraint, and outraging modesty), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the key witness (the alleged victim) was not produced before the court despite coercive measures, and the remaining evidence was hearsay or insufficient to establish the accused's involvement in the alleged September 27, 2024 incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Alappuzha First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Suraj Gogoi of charges under sections 333, 126(2), 115(2), and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (assault, wrongful restraint, and outraging modesty), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the key witness (the alleged victim) was not produced before the court despite coercive measures, and the remaining evidence was hearsay or insufficient to establish the accused's involvement in the alleged September 27, 2024 incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts