State of Kerala vs Kuruvi Suresh @ Suresh Advocate - ANIL KUMAR. K. B — 501842/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,427,434. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL060075892019

Filing Number

507922/2019

Filing Date

27-Feb-2019

Registration No

501842/2019

Registration Date

27-Feb-2019

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1615

Police Station

North Police Station Alappuzha

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,427,434
Crl.mp/4853/2025 Classification : Application to Issue Summons Section State of KeralaKuruvi Suresh @ Suresh
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Kuruvi Suresh @ Suresh

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kuruvi Suresh @ Suresh Advocate - ANIL KUMAR. K. B

  2. 2.Renjith

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR. K. B

  3. 3.Najeeb

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR. K. B

  4. 4.Manikuttan

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR. K. B

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court acquitted accused persons 2, 3, and 4 of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (causing hurt), 427 (mischief), and 34 (common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors in the acquittal included inconsistencies between witness testimonies and medical evidence, lack of independent witnesses, unexplained 16-hour delay in filing the complaint, absence of CCTV footage, and unsubstantiated claims of monetary loss. The case against the absconding first accused was split and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  12. 31-Oct-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    No Further Time

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  14. 27-Aug-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  15. 01-Aug-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  17. 19-Jun-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  18. 28-May-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  19. 05-May-2025

    Bound over

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  20. 01-Apr-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  21. 13-Feb-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  22. 01-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  23. 19-Nov-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  24. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 27-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 501842/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted accused persons 2, 3, and 4 of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (causing hurt), 427 (mischief), and 34 (common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors in the acquittal included inconsistencies between witness testimonies and medical evidence, lack of independent witnesses, unexplained 16-hour delay in filing the complaint, absence of CCTV footage, and unsubstantiated claims of monetary loss. The case against the absconding first accused was split and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case