State of Kerala represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Alappuzha South vs Ambross.V.Raphel — 501734/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323,325. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 17th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL060071772019
Filing Number
507198/2019
Filing Date
03-12-2019
Registration No
501734/2019
Registration Date
03-12-2019
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
1304
Police Station
South Police Station Alappuzha
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Alappuzha South
Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
Ambross.V.Raphel
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
82-83 Steps
For evidence
For evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 10-02-2026 | 82-83 Steps |
| 06-01-2026 | For evidence |
| 03-12-2025 | For evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Ambross V Raphel of charges under IPC sections 323, 325, and 294(b) (assault, causing hurt, and obscene words) because the prosecution failed to establish its case. The key ground for acquittal was that the injured complainant (CW1) was never examined despite repeated coercive steps, the two examined witnesses turned hostile, and no incriminating evidence remained on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Ambross V Raphel of charges under IPC sections 323, 325, and 294(b) (assault, causing hurt, and obscene words) because the prosecution failed to establish its case. The key ground for acquittal was that the injured complainant (CW1) was never examined despite repeated coercive steps, the two examined witnesses turned hostile, and no incriminating evidence remained on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts