State of Kerala vs Biju Kumar — 501285/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380,201,34,511,380. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL060027122023
Filing Number
502712/2023
Filing Date
27-Oct-2023
Registration No
501285/2023
Registration Date
27-Oct-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
647
Police Station
South Police Station Alappuzha
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala
Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Biju Kumar
-
2.Prasad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
The Alappuzha Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted the second accused (Prasad) of charges under sections 454, 380, 201, 34, and 511 IPC for theft from an Indo Steel establishment, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that key prosecution witnesses turned hostile, the disclosure statement was inadequate under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, and there was no proper connecting link between the accused and recovered articles. The case against the absconding first accused (Bijukumar) was split and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
06-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
02-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
20-Jan-2026
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
12-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
17-Nov-2025
82-83 Steps
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
16-Oct-2025
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
18-Aug-2025
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
10-Jul-2025
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
27-Jun-2025
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
16-Jun-2025
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
26-May-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
04-Apr-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
11-Feb-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
30-Jan-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
18-Dec-2024
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
14-Nov-2024
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
24-Jul-2024
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
17-May-2024
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
02-May-2024
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
18-Apr-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
04-Apr-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
21-Mar-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
07-Mar-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
22-Feb-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
08-Feb-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
25-Jan-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
11-Jan-2024
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
28-Dec-2023
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
14-Dec-2023
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
30-Nov-2023
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
16-Nov-2023
Remand Extended
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
02-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 501285/2023
The Alappuzha Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted the second accused (Prasad) of charges under sections 454, 380, 201, 34, and 511 IPC for theft from an Indo Steel establishment, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that key prosecution witnesses turned hostile, the disclosure statement was inadequate under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, and there was no proper connecting link between the accused and recovered articles. The case against the absconding first accused (Bijukumar) was split and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts