State of Kerala represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Alappuzha South vs Amal Noushad Advocate - ANIL. S — 501027/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 153. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL060020252022

Filing Number

502024/2022

Filing Date

13-Aug-2022

Registration No

501027/2022

Registration Date

13-Aug-2022

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

578

Police Station

South Police Station Alappuzha

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 153

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Alappuzha South

    Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amal Noushad Advocate - ANIL. S

  2. 2.sourav suresh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: CC No. 1027/2022 The Alappuzha Magistrate Court acquitted Amal Noushad and Saurav Suresh of charges under Section 153 IPC (incitement to communal riot) related to the alleged destruction of an Indira Gandhi statue on July 1, 2022. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case, as the sole witness (PW1) turned hostile, testifying he had not witnessed the incident and filed the complaint based on hearsay, prompting the prosecution to abandon examination of remaining witnesses and provide no incriminating evidence against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  6. 21-Nov-2025

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  7. 06-Oct-2025

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  8. 30-Jul-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  9. 21-Jun-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  10. 28-Apr-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  12. 22-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  13. 08-Nov-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  14. 07-Nov-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  15. 02-Aug-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  16. 24-Jun-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  17. 27-May-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  18. 13-Mar-2024

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  19. 23-Nov-2023

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  20. 17-Aug-2023

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  21. 27-May-2023

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  22. 29-Mar-2023

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  23. 13-Dec-2022

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  24. 26-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 13-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 501027/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 1027/2022 The Alappuzha Magistrate Court acquitted Amal Noushad and Saurav Suresh of charges under Section 153 IPC (incitement to communal riot) related to the alleged destruction of an Indira Gandhi statue on July 1, 2022. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case, as the sole witness (PW1) turned hostile, testifying he had not witnessed the incident and filed the complaint based on hearsay, prompting the prosecution to abandon examination of remaining witnesses and provide no incriminating evidence against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case