State of Keral - Police vs Kochumon Advocate - SULFIKAR S — 500574/2025
Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b),24. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 14th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL060013162025
Filing Number
1315/2025
Filing Date
30-Apr-2025
Registration No
500574/2025
Registration Date
30-Apr-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
309
Police Station
Thiruvananthapuram City Vattiyoorkavu PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Keral - Police
Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kochumon Advocate - SULFIKAR S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Alappuzha First Class Magistrate Court found accused Kochumon guilty of violating Section 6(b),24 of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce) Act, based on his voluntary guilty plea. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with an alternative punishment of 10 days simple imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
12-Mar-2026
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
27-Dec-2025
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
26-Nov-2025
Await warrent
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
24-Sep-2025
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha
-
03-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 500574/2025
The Alappuzha First Class Magistrate Court found accused Kochumon guilty of violating Section 6(b),24 of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce) Act, based on his voluntary guilty plea. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with an alternative punishment of 10 days simple imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts