HDFC Bank Ltd vs BINDU SATHYAN — 501999/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLAL060010152025

e-Filing Number

26-03-2025

Filing Number

1014/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

501999/2025

Registration Date

11-Apr-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC Bank Ltd

    Adv. SATHISAN P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BINDU SATHYAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: The JFCM Court-I, Alappuzha dismissed HDFC Bank Ltd's Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) against Bindu Sathyan for default. The petitioner failed to appear, was not represented, and took no steps despite repeated opportunities, resulting in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    For Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Return of notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  8. 02-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 501999/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The JFCM Court-I, Alappuzha dismissed HDFC Bank Ltd's Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) against Bindu Sathyan for default. The petitioner failed to appear, was not represented, and took no steps despite repeated opportunities, resulting in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case