State of Kerala represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Alappuzha North vs Smithin Das Advocate - GEETHA P P — 500129/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,427,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL060003492020

Filing Number

349/2020

Filing Date

30-Jan-2020

Registration No

500129/2020

Registration Date

30-Jan-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Alappuzha

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

236

Police Station

North Police Station Alappuzha

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,427,34
Crl.mp/4975/2025 Classification : Absent Petition Section Smithin Das

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Alappuzha North

    Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smithin Das Advocate - GEETHA P P

  2. 2.Ranjith

    Adv. GEETHA P P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted both accused (Smithildas and Renjith) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove its case because all key witnesses turned hostile—the injured parties and occurrence witnesses could not identify the accused and admitted the matter was settled between them, prompting the prosecution to abandon examination of remaining witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  10. 19-Sep-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  12. 11-Jul-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  13. 28-May-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  15. 04-Feb-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  16. 03-Feb-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  17. 30-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  18. 09-Dec-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  19. 17-Oct-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  20. 27-Sep-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  21. 09-Aug-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  22. 14-Jun-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  23. 19-Apr-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  24. 11-Apr-2024

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  25. 05-Feb-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  26. 18-Dec-2023

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  27. 13-Oct-2023

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  28. 11-Oct-2023

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  29. 16-Aug-2023

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  30. 24-May-2023

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  31. 27-Mar-2023

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  32. 28-Feb-2023

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  33. 19-Dec-2022

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  34. 31-Oct-2022

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  35. 24-Aug-2022

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  36. 28-May-2022

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  37. 14-Feb-2022

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  38. 11-Nov-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  39. 12-May-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  40. 16-Feb-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  41. 22-Jan-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  42. 14-Jan-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  43. 31-Dec-2020

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  44. 20-Oct-2020

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  45. 19-Aug-2020

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  46. 07-Jul-2020

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  47. 18-Feb-2020

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Alappuzha

  48. 15-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 30-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 500129/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted both accused (Smithildas and Renjith) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove its case because all key witnesses turned hostile—the injured parties and occurrence witnesses could not identify the accused and admitted the matter was settled between them, prompting the prosecution to abandon examination of remaining witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case