M/s ICICI Bank Limited vs Venus Traders — 400665/2024
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th March 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE
CNR: KLAL050011082024
e-Filing Number
04-11-2024
Filing Number
401104/2024
Filing Date
07-Nov-2024
Registration No
400665/2024
Registration Date
08-Nov-2024
Court
CJM Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s ICICI Bank Limited
Adv. RENJITH R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Venus Traders
-
2.Kasi Viswanathan
-
3.Subha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alappuzha granted ICICI Bank's application under the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of the secured asset (scheduled property) after respondents Venus Traders, Kasi Viswanathan, and Subha defaulted on loan repayment despite receiving statutory notice under Section 13(2). An advocate commissioner was appointed to take possession after 15 days' notice and hand over the property to the bank, with police assistance available if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
Stayed. Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2025
Stayed. Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Aug-2025
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 400665/2024
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alappuzha granted ICICI Bank's application under the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of the secured asset (scheduled property) after respondents Venus Traders, Kasi Viswanathan, and Subha defaulted on loan repayment despite receiving statutory notice under Section 13(2). An advocate commissioner was appointed to take possession after 15 days' notice and hand over the property to the bank, with police assistance available if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts