Grihum Housing Finance Limited vs Unni P J — 400594/2024

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 11th March 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE

CNR: KLAL050010002024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-10-2024

Filing Number

400996/2024

Filing Date

08-10-2024

Registration No

400594/2024

Registration Date

08-10-2024

Court

CJM Court Alappuzha

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT Section 14
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Restoration Petition Section Grihum Housing Finance LimitedUnni P J

Petitioner(s)

Grihum Housing Finance Limited

Adv. RENJITH R

Respondent(s)

Unni P J

Matheletha K K

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

11-03-2026

Disposed

15-01-2026

Call on

20-11-2025

For commission report

16-10-2025

For commission report

29-08-2025

Call on

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order
24-04-2026
Order

The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alappuzha dismissed Grihum Housing Finance Limited's petition seeking revival of a Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act case to take possession of a secured asset. The court found no justifiable ground for revival since possession as ordered on 08.10.2024 was not taken within the stipulated timeframe before the case was closed on 11.03.2026, despite the petitioner's claim of administrative delays due to officer transition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alappuzha dismissed Grihum Housing Finance Limited's petition seeking revival of a Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act case to take possession of a secured asset. The court found no justifiable ground for revival since possession as ordered on 08.10.2024 was not taken within the stipulated timeframe before the case was closed on 11.03.2026, despite the petitioner's claim of administrative delays due to officer transition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CJM Court Alappuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case