M/s Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ravi V Alias Raveendran Advocate - SREEJITH S — 400347/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE
CNR: KLAL050005122025
e-Filing Number
06-05-2025
Filing Number
511/2025
Filing Date
15-May-2025
Registration No
400347/2025
Registration Date
16-May-2025
Court
CJM Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Kerala Gramin Bank
Adv. RENJITH R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravi V Alias Raveendran Advocate - SREEJITH S
-
2.Cicily Mathew
-
3.Ratheesh Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alappuzha granted Kerala Gramin Bank's application under the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of the secured property pledged by the respondent-borrowers, who defaulted on their loan despite receiving statutory notice under Section 13(2). An advocate commissioner was appointed to take possession after 15 days' notice and hand it over to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jan-2026
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2025
Call with Mp
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jun-2025
For Depositting Batta
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2025
For Depositting Batta
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2025
For Depositting Batta
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 400347/2025
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alappuzha granted Kerala Gramin Bank's application under the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of the secured property pledged by the respondent-borrowers, who defaulted on their loan despite receiving statutory notice under Section 13(2). An advocate commissioner was appointed to take possession after 15 days' notice and hand it over to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts