M/s Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd vs Rajaneesh — 147/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14(1). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd May 2026.
Crl. MP(Complaint) - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION (COMPLAINT)
CNR: KLAL050002102026
Filing Number
162/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
CJM Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd
Adv. APARNA C. MENON
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajaneesh
-
2.Remchith
-
3.Retnamma
-
4.Rajitha
-
5.Prajith
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: M/s Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd v. Rajaneesh and Others (MC 147/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Alappuzha granted Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited's petition under Section 14(1) of the SARFAESI Act 2002 for possession of secured property. The respondents had defaulted on a housing loan despite receiving statutory notice under Section 13(2), and the account was classified as a Non-Performing Asset. However, the case was subsequently closed on 23 May 2026 after the parties settled the matter; possession was not taken and the original order dated 07 March 2026 remained outstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2026
Case Summary: M/s Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd v. Rajaneesh and Others (MC 147/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Alappuzha granted Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited's petition under Section 14(1) of the SARFAESI Act 2002 for possession of secured property. The respondents had defaulted on a housing loan despite receiving statutory notice under Section 13(2), and the account was classified as a Non-Performing Asset. However, the case was subsequently closed on 23 May 2026 after the parties settled the matter; possession was not taken and the original order dated 07 March 2026 remained outstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts