Bank of Baroda vs Renjith Kumar — 400123/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE
CNR: KLAL050001732025
e-Filing Number
10-02-2025
Filing Number
172/2025
Filing Date
11-Feb-2025
Registration No
400123/2025
Registration Date
12-Feb-2025
Court
CJM Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bank of Baroda
Adv. APARNA C MENON
Respondent(s)
-
1.Renjith Kumar
-
2.Dhanalekshmy G
-
3.Mohanakumar
-
4.Vasanthakumari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Alappuzha granted Bank of Baroda's petition under the SARFAESI Act 2002 for possession of secured property after the respondent borrowers defaulted on loan repayment despite receiving statutory notice. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the property within 15 days and hand it over to the bank for debt realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jan-2026
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2025
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Mar-2025
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 400123/2025
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Alappuzha granted Bank of Baroda's petition under the SARFAESI Act 2002 for possession of secured property after the respondent borrowers defaulted on loan repayment despite receiving statutory notice. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the property within 15 days and hand it over to the bank for debt realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts