State Bank of India vs Surendran G — 400050/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE
CNR: KLAL050000662025
e-Filing Number
17-01-2025
Filing Number
66/2025
Filing Date
22-Jan-2025
Registration No
400050/2025
Registration Date
23-Jan-2025
Court
CJM Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank of India
Adv. MIJI S MONY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Surendran G
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Alappuzha granted State Bank of India's petition under the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of the secured property of respondent Surendran.G, who defaulted on his loan repayment despite receiving statutory notice. An advocate commissioner was appointed to take possession of the property after 15 days' notice and hand it over to the bank, with the court noting that possession has already been taken as per the commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jan-2026
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Call on
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-May-2025
No sitting notified
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2025
For commission report
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2025
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 400050/2025
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Alappuzha granted State Bank of India's petition under the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of the secured property of respondent Surendran.G, who defaulted on his loan repayment despite receiving statutory notice. An advocate commissioner was appointed to take possession of the property after 15 days' notice and hand it over to the bank, with the court noting that possession has already been taken as per the commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts