R.Sanal Kumar vs Sasidharan — 200006/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section se96or41. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED WITH COST. on 30th March 2026.

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLAL030005892021

Case disposed

Filing Number

200246/2021

Filing Date

11-11-2021

Registration No

200006/2021

Registration Date

12-11-2021

Court

Sub Court Alappuzha

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED WITH COST.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section se96or41
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Application for Admission of Documents Section R.Sanal KumarSasidharan
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Application to Receive Documents Section R.Sanal KumarSasidharan
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section R.Sanal Kumar
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section R.Sanal KumarSasidharan

Petitioner(s)

R.Sanal Kumar

Adv. PARAMESWARAN. C

Respondent(s)

Sasidharan

Sabu

Pushkaran

Manoharan.S

Salim.M.P

Bineesh Chandran.R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha

30-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

FOR HEARING

05-03-2026

FOR HEARING

04-03-2026

FOR HEARING

19-02-2026

Listed to

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Judgement

Court Summary The Subordinate Judge of Alappuzha dismissed the appellants' suit seeking to frame a management scheme for the Paravoor Subramanya Swamy Devaswom (temple), finding the case barred by the principle of *res judicata*. The court held that the identical question regarding whether the temple is a private family trust or a public trust was already conclusively decided in earlier proceedings (AS.90/2005) where the same parties were involved, and therefore the present suit cannot be relitigated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

20-09-2022
Judgement
casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Subordinate Judge of Alappuzha dismissed the appellants' suit seeking to frame a management scheme for the Paravoor Subramanya Swamy Devaswom (temple), finding the case barred by the principle of *res judicata*. The court held that the identical question regarding whether the temple is a private family trust or a public trust was already conclusively decided in earlier proceedings (AS.90/2005) where the same parties were involved, and therefore the present suit cannot be relitigated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court Alappuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case