State of Kerala Police vs Dinesan Advocate - SUDHEER P — 200603/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,326. Status: BW to cws. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

BW to cws Next hearing 21-May-2026 this date has passed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLAL030005292021

Filing Number

110/2021

Filing Date

30-Sep-2021

Registration No

200603/2021

Registration Date

30-Sep-2021

Court

Sub Court Alappuzha

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

North Police Station, Alappuzha

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,326

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Police

    Adv. AGP and PP For Sub Court, Alappuzha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dinesan Advocate - SUDHEER P

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    BW to cws

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    BW to cws

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Bound over

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by the State of Kerala under Section 311 CrPC to examine additional witnesses (Dr. Hegde and Dr. Adarsh K.M) and produce medical records (CT scan report and discharge summary) from Sahridaya Hospital regarding victim Jyothimon's injuries was allowed. The court held that the investigating officer's failure to produce relevant medical evidence earlier constitutes an oversight in prosecution management that should be rectified, especially where eyewitness evidence is cogent and truthful, to serve the interests of criminal justice administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  12. 01-Nov-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Prays time

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  14. 22-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  16. 16-Sep-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  18. 01-Aug-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  19. 22-Jul-2025

    Declared Holidays

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  20. 08-Jul-2025

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  21. 27-Jun-2025

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    BW to cws

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  23. 20-Jun-2025

    BW to cws

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  24. 18-Jun-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  25. 16-Jun-2025

    Bound over

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  26. 13-Jun-2025

    Bound over

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  27. 10-Jun-2025

    Bound over

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  28. 29-Mar-2025

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  29. 03-Jan-2025

    For evidence

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  30. 23-Sep-2024

    For evidence

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  31. 30-Aug-2024

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  32. 22-Jul-2024

    Issue Summons

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  33. 21-Jun-2024

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  34. 15-Jun-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  35. 02-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  36. 25-Jul-2023

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  37. 24-May-2023

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  38. 10-Jan-2023

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  39. 11-Aug-2022

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  40. 18-Mar-2022

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge, Alappuzha

  41. 02-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 30-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200603/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by the State of Kerala under Section 311 CrPC to examine additional witnesses (Dr. Hegde and Dr. Adarsh K.M) and produce medical records (CT scan report and discharge summary) from Sahridaya Hospital regarding victim Jyothimon's injuries was allowed. The court held that the investigating officer's failure to produce relevant medical evidence earlier constitutes an oversight in prosecution management that should be rectified, especially where eyewitness evidence is cogent and truthful, to serve the interests of criminal justice administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case