State of Kerala Police vs Dinesan Advocate - SUDHEER P — 200603/2021
Case under Ipc \ Section 294(b),324,326. Status: BW to cws. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL030005292021
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
110/2021
Filing Date
30-09-2021
Registration No
200603/2021
Registration Date
30-09-2021
Court
Sub Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha
FIR Details
FIR Number
124
Police Station
North Police Station, Alappuzha
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. AGP and PP For Sub Court, Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
Dinesan Advocate - SUDHEER P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha
BW to cws
call on
call on
call on
call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | BW to cws | |
| 09-03-2026 | call on | |
| 19-02-2026 | call on | |
| 06-02-2026 | call on | |
| 22-01-2026 | call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the State of Kerala under Section 311 CrPC to examine additional witnesses (Dr. Hegde and Dr. Adarsh K.M) and produce medical records (CT scan report and discharge summary) from Sahridaya Hospital regarding victim Jyothimon's injuries was allowed. The court held that the investigating officer's failure to produce relevant medical evidence earlier constitutes an oversight in prosecution management that should be rectified, especially where eyewitness evidence is cogent and truthful, to serve the interests of criminal justice administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the State of Kerala under Section 311 CrPC to examine additional witnesses (Dr. Hegde and Dr. Adarsh K.M) and produce medical records (CT scan report and discharge summary) from Sahridaya Hospital regarding victim Jyothimon's injuries was allowed. The court held that the investigating officer's failure to produce relevant medical evidence earlier constitutes an oversight in prosecution management that should be rectified, especially where eyewitness evidence is cogent and truthful, to serve the interests of criminal justice administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts