Lekha Baiju vs Deepaguran Advocate - SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN — 200014/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section se26orVII. Disposed: Contested--PRELIMINARY DECREE PASSED. on 28th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL030001752023
Filing Number
200089/2023
Filing Date
05-04-2023
Registration No
200014/2023
Registration Date
05-04-2023
Court
Sub Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PRELIMINARY DECREE PASSED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lekha Baiju
Adv. Rosy.P.F and Philip N Joseph
Lija Baiju
Lijil Baiju
Joshy
Sibi Banarji
Amal Raj
Sadanandan
Chellamma
Rajesh
Padmaprasad
Respondent(s)
Deepaguran Advocate - SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN
Sulekha Sabu
Adv. DHARMAPALAN K
Sujatha Kunjumon
Adv. DHARMAPALAN K
Mahesh Babu
Pushpalatha
Jayasree Manoharan
Shaila Vijayan
Revamma Bhargavan
Sujedambika Kunjumon
Rajamma
Mandakini
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha
Disposed
call on
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | call on |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 11-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Subordinate Judge of Alappuzha decreed a partition suit filed by ten plaintiffs seeking division of 14.70 acres of ancestral property owned by their grandmother Kunjipennu, who died intestate in 1987. The court held that the property remains joint and undivided, and dismissed the defendants' claim of prior oral partition in 1992, finding their evidence unreliable and noting that property records still show joint ownership. The court granted each of the seven children of Kunjipennu an equal 1/7th share, with further divisions for grandchildren according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Subordinate Judge of Alappuzha decreed a partition suit filed by ten plaintiffs seeking division of 14.70 acres of ancestral property owned by their grandmother Kunjipennu, who died intestate in 1987. The court held that the property remains joint and undivided, and dismissed the defendants' claim of prior oral partition in 1992, finding their evidence unreliable and noting that property records still show joint ownership. The court granted each of the seven children of Kunjipennu an equal 1/7th share, with further divisions for grandchildren according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts