Lekha Baiju vs Deepaguran Advocate - SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN — 200014/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section se26orVII. Disposed: Contested--PRELIMINARY DECREE PASSED. on 28th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL030001752023
Filing Number
200089/2023
Filing Date
05-Apr-2023
Registration No
200014/2023
Registration Date
05-Apr-2023
Court
Sub Court Alappuzha
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Alappuzha
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PRELIMINARY DECREE PASSED.
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lekha Baiju
Adv. Rosy.P.F and Philip N Joseph
-
2.Lija Baiju
-
3.Lijil Baiju
-
4.Joshy
-
5.Sibi Banarji
-
6.Amal Raj
-
7.Sadanandan
-
8.Chellamma
-
9.Rajesh
-
10.Padmaprasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepaguran Advocate - SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN
-
2.Sulekha Sabu
Adv. DHARMAPALAN K
-
3.Sujatha Kunjumon
Adv. DHARMAPALAN K
-
4.Mahesh Babu
-
5.Pushpalatha
-
6.Jayasree Manoharan
-
7.Shaila Vijayan
-
8.Revamma Bhargavan
-
9.Sujedambika Kunjumon
-
10.Rajamma
-
11.Mandakini
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgement
Court Summary The Subordinate Judge of Alappuzha decreed a partition suit filed by ten plaintiffs seeking division of 14.70 acres of ancestral property owned by their grandmother Kunjipennu, who died intestate in 1987. The court held that the property remains joint and undivided, and dismissed the defendants' claim of prior oral partition in 1992, finding their evidence unreliable and noting that property records still show joint ownership. The court granted each of the seven children of Kunjipennu an equal 1/7th share, with further divisions for grandchildren according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
12-Mar-2026
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
05-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
18-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
11-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
09-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
30-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
27-Jan-2026
for evidence.
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
22-Jan-2026
for evidence.
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
17-Jan-2026
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
15-Jan-2026
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
12-Jan-2026
for evidence.
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
09-Jan-2026
for evidence.
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
06-Jan-2026
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
05-Jan-2026
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
12-Dec-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
10-Dec-2025
Further evidence
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
06-Dec-2025
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
01-Dec-2025
call on
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
27-Nov-2025
Objection
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
26-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
20-Nov-2025
Bound over
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
13-Nov-2025
for evidence.
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
07-Nov-2025
Further evidence
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
01-Nov-2025
For evidence
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
20-Sep-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
11-Sep-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
17-Jul-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
21-Jun-2025
Pre trial steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
21-May-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
09-Apr-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
30-Jan-2025
Return of summons
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
16-Nov-2024
Return of summons
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
29-Oct-2024
No Further Time
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
30-Sep-2024
Return of summons
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
24-Aug-2024
Return of notice
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
18-Jul-2024
For Steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
02-Jul-2024
For Steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
03-Jun-2024
Listed to
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
26-Mar-2024
Pre trial steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
06-Jan-2024
Issues
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
07-Nov-2023
Issues
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
04-Oct-2023
Appearance Of Parties
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
03-Oct-2023
Call with IA
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
25-Sep-2023
For Steps
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
04-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Alappuzha
-
20-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 200014/2023
Court Summary The Subordinate Judge of Alappuzha decreed a partition suit filed by ten plaintiffs seeking division of 14.70 acres of ancestral property owned by their grandmother Kunjipennu, who died intestate in 1987. The court held that the property remains joint and undivided, and dismissed the defendants' claim of prior oral partition in 1992, finding their evidence unreliable and noting that property records still show joint ownership. The court granted each of the seven children of Kunjipennu an equal 1/7th share, with further divisions for grandchildren according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts