State of Kerala Police vs Unnikrishnan Advocate - SOUMYA P S — 101554/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(i),118(i),120(2).,296(b),351(2). Status: Appearance of Accused. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLAL010055692024

Appearance of Accused

Next Hearing

28th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

104809/2024

Filing Date

20-12-2024

Registration No

101554/2024

Registration Date

20-12-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

FIR Details

FIR Number

861

Police Station

Kuthiathodu Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(i),118(i),120(2).,296(b),351(2)
Crl.MP/3764/2025 Classification : Bail Application Section UnnikrishnanState of Kerala Police
Crl.MP/3766/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section UnnikrishnanState of Kerala Police
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Unnikrishnan

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha

Respondent(s)

Unnikrishnan Advocate - SOUMYA P S

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

22-04-2026

Appearance of Accused

08-04-2026

Appearance of Accused

25-03-2026

call on

11-03-2026

For framing charge

25-02-2026

Hearing on Charge

Interim Orders

14-01-2026
Order

Summary: The petition filed by accused Unnikrishnan to modify his bail condition has been dismissed. The accused, charged with murder under BNS sections 103(1), 118(1), 120(2), 296(b), and 351(2), requested to reduce the surety requirement from two sureties to one, claiming insufficient sureties; however, the court rejected this modification considering the serious nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by accused Unnikrishnan to modify his bail condition has been dismissed. The accused, charged with murder under BNS sections 103(1), 118(1), 120(2), 296(b), and 351(2), requested to reduce the surety requirement from two sureties to one, claiming insufficient sureties; however, the court rejected this modification considering the serious nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case