Kotak Mahindra Prime LTD vs Karthikeyan C — 58/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLAL010045302025

Case disposed

Filing Number

497/2025

Filing Date

14-11-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 9
IA/1/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Kotak Mahindra Prime LTD
IA/2/2025 Classification : Application To Receive Documents Section Kotak Mahindra Prime LTD

Petitioner(s)

Kotak Mahindra Prime LTD

Adv. Aparna

Respondent(s)

Karthikeyan C

Sudheesh Kumar K

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-02-2026

For Steps

01-01-2026

Objection

25-11-2025

Objection

24-11-2025

FOR ADMISSION

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

The District Court of Alappuzha dismissed Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.'s arbitration petition (MA No. 58/2025) as it was not pressed by the petitioner. The court vacated the interim order previously granted, with the condition that it shall remain vacated if arbitration proceedings are not initiated within 90 days as per Kerala Arbitration and Conciliation (Court) Rules 5A. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court of Alappuzha dismissed Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.'s arbitration petition (MA No. 58/2025) as it was not pressed by the petitioner. The court vacated the interim order previously granted, with the condition that it shall remain vacated if arbitration proceedings are not initiated within 90 days as per Kerala Arbitration and Conciliation (Court) Rules 5A. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case