Excise Range Inspector vs Rinas.B Advocate - ABHILASH K VINAYAN, Navyalakshmi M — 253/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 20(b)(ii)C, 20(b)(ii)B , 22c , 22(b) & 29. Status: For production of accused. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

For production of accused Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Cr.No(ALP-ERO-NDPS-Alappuzha) - Excise Range, Alappuzha - NDPS

CNR: KLAL010044302025

Filing Number

173/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

Excise Range, Alappuzha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 20(b)(ii)C, 20(b)(ii)B , 22c , 22(b) & 29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Excise Range Inspector

  2. 2.Excise Inspector

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rinas.B Advocate - ABHILASH K VINAYAN, Navyalakshmi M

  2. 2.Ananthu.K.S

    Adv. STEPHY THANKACHAN,STEPHY THANKACHAN VIVEK VENUGOPAL

  3. 3.Appu.P.S

    Adv. STEPHY THANKACHAN,Francis Assisi

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    For production of accused

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    For framing charge

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Issue notice

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  5. 26-May-2026

    Await report

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  6. 13-May-2026

    Remand Extended

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 253/2026 Outcome: Bail application dismissed. Accused Appu.P.S sought bail in a narcotic drugs case involving possession of methamphetamine (3.76 gm) and ganja (2.138 kg) seized on 10.11.2025. The court rejected the bail application, citing applicable statutory bail bar under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the accused's involvement in three other NDPS cases, and insufficient grounds to believe innocence or that he wouldn't commit similar offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 28-Apr-2026

    call on

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  9. 25-Apr-2026

    Call with Mp

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  10. 23-Apr-2026

    Call with Mp

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  11. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing on Charge

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  12. 01-Apr-2026

    Remand Extended

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Remand Extended

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    Issue production warrant

    Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 16-Jan-2026

    Order

  17. 20-Dec-2025

    Order

  18. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 253/2026 Outcome: Bail application dismissed. Accused Appu.P.S sought bail in a narcotic drugs case involving possession of methamphetamine (3.76 gm) and ganja (2.138 kg) seized on 10.11.2025. The court rejected the bail application, citing applicable statutory bail bar under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the accused's involvement in three other NDPS cases, and insufficient grounds to believe innocence or that he wouldn't commit similar offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case