Kerala State Electricity Board Limited represented its Secretary vs George M George Advocate - MATHEW P K — 68/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 104 order 43 Rule 1(c) of Civil Procedure Code. Status: Await Records. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLAL010043982025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
545/2025
Filing Date
07-11-2025
Registration No
68/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kerala State Electricity Board Limited represented its Secretary
Adv. JAYAN C DAS
Respondent(s)
George M George Advocate - MATHEW P K
Ananthu. B. Raj
The New India Assurance Co.Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Await Records
Call with IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Await Records |
| 30-03-2026 | Call with IA |
| 28-03-2026 | Call with IA |
| 27-03-2026 | Call with IA |
| 12-03-2026 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Judge of Alappuzha allowed the petition and condoned the 305-day delay in filing the appeal by Kerala State Electricity Board Limited against a trial court order dated 30.11.2024. The petitioner's counsel had mistakenly noted the trial date and misplaced the certified copy of the order, causing the delay. The court accepted this explanation as sufficient and condoned the delay on payment of ₹3,000 cost to the respondents, prioritizing disposal of the matter on merit over technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Judge of Alappuzha allowed the petition and condoned the 305-day delay in filing the appeal by Kerala State Electricity Board Limited against a trial court order dated 30.11.2024. The petitioner's counsel had mistakenly noted the trial date and misplaced the certified copy of the order, causing the delay. The court accepted this explanation as sufficient and condoned the delay on payment of ₹3,000 cost to the respondents, prioritizing disposal of the matter on merit over technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →Explore other courts