Augustine Joseph vs Antony D Advocate - VISWANADHAN PILLAI K B — 54/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLAL010037672025
Filing Number
531/2025
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
26-Sep-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Augustine Joseph
Adv. SULFIKAR S
-
2.Anila
Adv. SULFIKAR S
-
3.Babila
Adv. SULFIKAR S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Antony D Advocate - VISWANADHAN PILLAI K B
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Augustine Joseph & Others v. Antony D (CMA 54/2025) The District Court of Alappuzha dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging an ex-parte judgment and decree passed against them in a money recovery suit. The appellants claimed the defendant (a housewife) could not file a written statement timely because her husband, who was providing instructions to counsel, was working abroad. The court rejected these contentions, finding the appellants were not diligent in prosecuting the case despite nearly two years of opportunities, lacked credible documentary evidence, and appeared to delay execution proceedings. Both parties ordered to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
26-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Await Records
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
23-Feb-2026
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
22-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
19-Jan-2026
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
12-Jan-2026
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
17-Dec-2025
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
06-Dec-2025
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
24-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
Call with IA
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
17-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
call on
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
15-Nov-2025
call on
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
29-Oct-2025
call on
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
29-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2025
Case Summary: Augustine Joseph & Others v. Antony D (CMA 54/2025) The District Court of Alappuzha dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging an ex-parte judgment and decree passed against them in a money recovery suit. The appellants claimed the defendant (a housewife) could not file a written statement timely because her husband, who was providing instructions to counsel, was working abroad. The court rejected these contentions, finding the appellants were not diligent in prosecuting the case despite nearly two years of opportunities, lacked credible documentary evidence, and appeared to delay execution proceedings. Both parties ordered to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts