State of Kerala Police vs Kiran DCruz Advocate - Muhammed Arshad H, NISSAM NAZZAR — 101022/2023

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 8(C),22(b),20(b)(ii)A. Status: Hearing on Charge. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLAL010037642023

Hearing on Charge

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

103251/2023

Filing Date

05-10-2023

Registration No

101022/2023

Registration Date

05-10-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

FIR Details

FIR Number

1090

Police Station

North Police Station, Alappuzha

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 8(C),22(b),20(b)(ii)A
Crl.MP/2426/2025 Classification : Absent Petition Section Kiran DCruz
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Kiran DCruzState of Kerala Police
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section Kiran DCruzState of Kerala Police

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Respondent(s)

Kiran DCruz Advocate - Muhammed Arshad H, NISSAM NAZZAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

09-03-2026

Hearing on Charge

12-02-2026

Hearing on Charge

07-02-2026

Call with MP

06-02-2026

Call with MP

02-02-2026

Call with MP

Interim Orders

12-02-2026
Order

Summary The petition was allowed. The court exempted the accused, Kiran D Cruz, from personal appearance for one year in a narcotics case (NDPS Act sections 22(b) and 20(b)(ii)A), allowing him to take employment in UAE. He must be represented through counsel and appear when directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition was allowed. The court exempted the accused, Kiran D Cruz, from personal appearance for one year in a narcotics case (NDPS Act sections 22(b) and 20(b)(ii)A), allowing him to take employment in UAE. He must be represented through counsel and appear when directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case