Arun Baby vs District Register — 100024/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 45. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLAL010027112023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-08-2023

Filing Number

100549/2023

Filing Date

07-08-2023

Registration No

100024/2023

Registration Date

07-08-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

4-Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 45
IA/4/2025 Classification : Restoration Petition Section Arun BabyDistrict Register

Petitioner(s)

Arun Baby

Adv. HARIKUMAR G

Chinnu Joseph

Adv. HARIKUMAR G

Respondent(s)

District Register

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

16-02-2026

FOR HEARING

27-01-2026

call on

12-01-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order

Summary The Additional District Judge-III, Alappuzha allowed the appellants' appeal and set aside the District Registrar's order that had enhanced property valuation by ₹1 crore under the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959. The court found the original order was passed mechanically without considering the appellants' detailed replies regarding property valuation or following prescribed statutory procedures under Rule 5 of the Kerala Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules 1968. The case was remanded to the District Registrar for fresh determination while strictly adhering to procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-02-2024
Order
16-02-2024
Order
26-08-2025
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge-III, Alappuzha allowed the appellants' appeal and set aside the District Registrar's order that had enhanced property valuation by ₹1 crore under the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959. The court found the original order was passed mechanically without considering the appellants' detailed replies regarding property valuation or following prescribed statutory procedures under Rule 5 of the Kerala Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules 1968. The case was remanded to the District Registrar for fresh determination while strictly adhering to procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case