Rifana vs State of Kerala Police — 100025/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 440. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.RP - REVISION PETITION (CRIMINAL)

CNR: KLAL010026282025

e-Filing Number

28-06-2025

Filing Number

2250/2025

Filing Date

28-Jun-2025

Registration No

100025/2025

Registration Date

28-Jun-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

4-Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rifana

    Adv. BABU K V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge-III, Alappuzha dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Rifana challenging the magistrate's order accepting the investigating officer's referral report. The court found the petition infructuous and closed it because the accused (Respondent No.2) had died, rendering further proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    call on

    Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  5. 17-Nov-2025

    Issue notice

    Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  6. 16-Aug-2025

    Issue notice

    Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge -III Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  7. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 28-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100025/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge-III, Alappuzha dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Rifana challenging the magistrate's order accepting the investigating officer's referral report. The court found the petition infructuous and closed it because the accused (Respondent No.2) had died, rendering further proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case