Gopakumar Ramachandran vs The south indian bank Advocate - ANISH — 100004/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Uncontested--Matter settled. on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CA - Commercial Appeal

CNR: KLAL010024982025

e-Filing Number

20-06-2025

Filing Number

465/2025

Filing Date

20-Jun-2025

Registration No

100004/2025

Registration Date

21-Jun-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Matter settled.

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopakumar Ramachandran

    Adv. JAYASIMHAN R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The south indian bank Advocate - ANISH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The District Court of Alappuzha allowed the appeal in part based on a mediation agreement between Gopakumar Ramachandran and South Indian Bank Ltd. The court accepted the settlement, finding the parties entered into the agreement voluntarily with no terms against public policy, and limited the decree claim to Rs. 12,00,000, which the appellant paid in full satisfaction. Court fee shall be refunded as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    call on

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Await report

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Report on mediation

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  16. 15-Nov-2025

    call on

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  17. 17-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  18. 17-Oct-2025

    call on

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  19. 24-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  20. 17-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  21. 11-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  22. 02-Aug-2025

    Return of notice

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  23. 09-Jul-2025

    Return of notice

    District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

  24. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 20-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100004/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Alappuzha allowed the appeal in part based on a mediation agreement between Gopakumar Ramachandran and South Indian Bank Ltd. The court accepted the settlement, finding the parties entered into the agreement voluntarily with no terms against public policy, and limited the decree claim to Rs. 12,00,000, which the appellant paid in full satisfaction. Court fee shall be refunded as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case