Subhash vs State of Kerala — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 423. Status: Issue notice. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLAL010000472026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
03-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court Alappuzha/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
3-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subhash
Adv. SANDRAE NELSON
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Kerala
Case History
-
27-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue notice
Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge-II Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
09-Feb-2026
For Admission
District and Sessions Judge Alappuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority
-
07-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Alappuzha allowed the petition filed by the accused Subhash to condone an 11-day delay in preferring an appeal against the trial court's conviction dated 25.11.2025. The accused was convicted under IPC sections 308 and 506(ii), sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment with ₹50,000 fine and 1 year rigorous imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine respectively. The court accepted the petitioner's claim of illness (viral fever) as sufficient cause for the delay and granted the condonation petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Alappuzha allowed the petition filed by the accused Subhash to condone an 11-day delay in preferring an appeal against the trial court's conviction dated 25.11.2025. The accused was convicted under IPC sections 308 and 506(ii), sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment with ₹50,000 fine and 1 year rigorous imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine respectively. The court accepted the petitioner's claim of illness (viral fever) as sufficient cause for the delay and granted the condonation petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts