Verupakshi S/o Hanamantha Galag , Age 36 Yrs, Occ Employee vs Soundarya D/o Veeraupakshi, Age 03 Yrs Minor U/G of his natural moter by name Vinoda W/ Veerypakshi — 5036/2025

Case Summary: Crl.R.P.No. 5036/2025 Court Decision: The revision petition filed by the husband (Veerupakshi) challenging the trial court's interim maintenance order was dismissed. The trial court's order granting Rs. 2,000 monthly interim maintenance to each of the wife (Vinoda) and 3-year-old daughter (Soundarya) was confirmed. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of marriage between the petitioner and respondent, including marriage invitation cards, service records naming the wife, and birth certificates. Although the respondent claimed he had married another woman named Malashree in 2014 and fathered four children with her, he produced no documentary proof. The court held that mere denial without evidence was insufficient to reject maintenance claims, especially given the respondent's status as a government employee with stable income. The court also noted that even illegitimate children are entitled to maintenance under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.