Pushpa D/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 31 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist and Private work vs Parvatamma W/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 71 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist — 5094/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAYG320006102025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5094/2025

Filing Date

02-08-2023

Registration No

5094/2025

Registration Date

03-08-2023

Court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR

Judge

1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

Pushpa D/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 31 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist and Private work

Adv. ANANDKUMAR SWAMY

Ayyanna S/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 41 Yrs, Occ Agri and Private work

Respondent(s)

Parvatamma W/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 71 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist

Ramesh S/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 48 Yrs, Occ Agri and Private work

Saroja Devi W/o Siddanna (D/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad), Age 43 Yrs, Occ Agri and Private work

Bhimreddy S/o Sharanappa Gouda Police Patil, Age 41 Yrs, Occ Govt Servant

Sharanayya S/o Abdulsa Elligera, Age 61 Yrs, Occ Agri

Gouramma W/o Shivaputra Hadapad, Age 48 Yrs, Occ House hold

Hearing History

Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The appellate court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and set aside the trial court's partial decree, declaring that three registered sale deeds (dated 2003, 2005, and 2009) executed by their deceased father Somashekhar are null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs' and co-defendants' shares in ancestral joint family properties. The court held that the defendants failed to prove the father was a valid joint family Karta (manager) or that legal/family necessity existed for the sales, particularly since the father was allegedly alcohol-addicted and the family had earning members with no demonstrated financial need. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The appellate court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and set aside the trial court's partial decree, declaring that three registered sale deeds (dated 2003, 2005, and 2009) executed by their deceased father Somashekhar are null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs' and co-defendants' shares in ancestral joint family properties. The court held that the defendants failed to prove the father was a valid joint family Karta (manager) or that legal/family necessity existed for the sales, particularly since the father was allegedly alcohol-addicted and the family had earning members with no demonstrated financial need. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case