Pushpa D/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 31 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist and Private work vs Parvatamma W/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 71 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist — 5094/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAYG320006102025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5094/2025
Filing Date
02-08-2023
Registration No
5094/2025
Registration Date
03-08-2023
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpa D/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 31 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist and Private work
Adv. ANANDKUMAR SWAMY
Ayyanna S/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 41 Yrs, Occ Agri and Private work
Respondent(s)
Parvatamma W/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 71 Yrs, Occ Agriculturist
Ramesh S/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad, Age 48 Yrs, Occ Agri and Private work
Saroja Devi W/o Siddanna (D/o Late Somashekhar Hadapad), Age 43 Yrs, Occ Agri and Private work
Bhimreddy S/o Sharanappa Gouda Police Patil, Age 41 Yrs, Occ Govt Servant
Sharanayya S/o Abdulsa Elligera, Age 61 Yrs, Occ Agri
Gouramma W/o Shivaputra Hadapad, Age 48 Yrs, Occ House hold
Hearing History
Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The appellate court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and set aside the trial court's partial decree, declaring that three registered sale deeds (dated 2003, 2005, and 2009) executed by their deceased father Somashekhar are null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs' and co-defendants' shares in ancestral joint family properties. The court held that the defendants failed to prove the father was a valid joint family Karta (manager) or that legal/family necessity existed for the sales, particularly since the father was allegedly alcohol-addicted and the family had earning members with no demonstrated financial need. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The appellate court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal and set aside the trial court's partial decree, declaring that three registered sale deeds (dated 2003, 2005, and 2009) executed by their deceased father Somashekhar are null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs' and co-defendants' shares in ancestral joint family properties. The court held that the defendants failed to prove the father was a valid joint family Karta (manager) or that legal/family necessity existed for the sales, particularly since the father was allegedly alcohol-addicted and the family had earning members with no demonstrated financial need. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →Explore other courts