Kembhavi PS vs A-1 Chandrakala W/o Vishwanathareddy Lakkundi, Age 22 Yrs, Occ Mane Kelasa, — 5211/2025

Case under Sec 323 324 504 506 of Ipc Section U/s,328,307,34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KAYG320005322025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5211/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2022

Registration No

5211/2025

Registration Date

15-07-2022

Court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR

Judge

1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0169

Police Station

KEMBHAVI PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

SEC 323 324 504 506 OF IPC Section U/s,328,307,34

Petitioner(s)

Kembhavi PS (Police Station)

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

A-1 Chandrakala W/o Vishwanathareddy Lakkundi, Age 22 Yrs, Occ Mane Kelasa,

A-2 Basanagouda So Sugareddy Tirakappanavar, Age 25 Yrs, Occ Agri,

A-3 Balappa S/o Ningappa Narayani, Age 24 Yrs,Occ Raghavendra Medical Shop Work

Hearing History

Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

29-04-2026

Disposed

25-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

17-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

16-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: SC.No.5211/2025 Court Decision: Accused No.1 (Chandrakala) and Accused No.2 (Basanagouda) have been acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 328 (administering poison), 284 (rash/negligent act endangering life), and 109 (abetment). Key Reasoning: The court found that all prosecution witnesses, including the complainant (PW1), testified that they knew nothing about the alleged incident and had not given statements to police. The court determined that the prosecution utterly failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, with no credible evidence supporting the allegations that the accused administered drugged water to the complainant and attempted to strangle him. Accused No.3's proceedings were separately quashed by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC.No.5211/2025 Court Decision: Accused No.1 (Chandrakala) and Accused No.2 (Basanagouda) have been acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 328 (administering poison), 284 (rash/negligent act endangering life), and 109 (abetment). Key Reasoning: The court found that all prosecution witnesses, including the complainant (PW1), testified that they knew nothing about the alleged incident and had not given statements to police. The court determined that the prosecution utterly failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, with no credible evidence supporting the allegations that the accused administered drugged water to the complainant and attempted to strangle him. Accused No.3's proceedings were separately quashed by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case