Kembhavi PS vs A-1 Chandrakala W/o Vishwanathareddy Lakkundi, Age 22 Yrs, Occ Mane Kelasa, — 5211/2025
Case under Sec 323 324 504 506 of Ipc Section U/s,328,307,34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAYG320005322025
Filing Number
5211/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2022
Registration No
5211/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2022
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0169
Police Station
KEMBHAVI PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kembhavi PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
A-1 Chandrakala W/o Vishwanathareddy Lakkundi, Age 22 Yrs, Occ Mane Kelasa,
A-2 Basanagouda So Sugareddy Tirakappanavar, Age 25 Yrs, Occ Agri,
A-3 Balappa S/o Ningappa Narayani, Age 24 Yrs,Occ Raghavendra Medical Shop Work
Hearing History
Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 16-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SC.No.5211/2025 Court Decision: Accused No.1 (Chandrakala) and Accused No.2 (Basanagouda) have been acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 328 (administering poison), 284 (rash/negligent act endangering life), and 109 (abetment). Key Reasoning: The court found that all prosecution witnesses, including the complainant (PW1), testified that they knew nothing about the alleged incident and had not given statements to police. The court determined that the prosecution utterly failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, with no credible evidence supporting the allegations that the accused administered drugged water to the complainant and attempted to strangle him. Accused No.3's proceedings were separately quashed by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SC.No.5211/2025 Court Decision: Accused No.1 (Chandrakala) and Accused No.2 (Basanagouda) have been acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 328 (administering poison), 284 (rash/negligent act endangering life), and 109 (abetment). Key Reasoning: The court found that all prosecution witnesses, including the complainant (PW1), testified that they knew nothing about the alleged incident and had not given statements to police. The court determined that the prosecution utterly failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, with no credible evidence supporting the allegations that the accused administered drugged water to the complainant and attempted to strangle him. Accused No.3's proceedings were separately quashed by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →Explore other courts