Kembavi PS vs A- 1 Shekhargouda S/o Sidannagouda Subedar, Age 52 Yrs, Occ Agri, — 5204/2025
Case under Sec of Ipc Section U/s143,147,148,448,323,324,307,427,504149IPC. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 27th May 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAYG320005252025
Filing Number
5204/2025
Filing Date
25-05-2021
Registration No
5204/2025
Registration Date
25-05-2021
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Decision Date
27th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0091
Police Station
KEMBHAVI PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kembavi PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
A- 1 Shekhargouda S/o Sidannagouda Subedar, Age 52 Yrs, Occ Agri,
A- 2 Mahanatagouda S/o Siddanagouda Subedara, Occ Agri,
A- 3 Rajugouda S/o Mahanatgouda Subhedar, Age 25 Yrs, Occ Agri,
A- 4 Prabhugouda S/o Basanagouda Subhedar, Age 28 Yrs, Occ Agri,
A- 5 Sahebagouda S/o Siddanagouda Subhedar, Occ Agri,
A- 6 Santhogouda S/o Shekargouda Subhedar, Occ Agri,
A- 7 Somanagouda S/o Shankargouda Subhedar, Occ Agri,
A- 8 Mallanagouda S/o Amarappa Adiginami, Occ Agri,
A- 9 Sangangouda S/o Sahebagouda Subhedar, Occ Agri,
A- 10 Appugouda S/o Gurunnagouda Siddagola, Age 30 Yrs, Occ Agri,
Hearing History
Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-05-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 21-05-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 30-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 29-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Shekhargouda & Others (SC.No.5204/2025) Court Decision: All 10 accused persons were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 448, 427, 307, 504 read with 149 (unlawful assembly, rioting, house trespass, mischief, attempt to murder, and criminal intimidation). Key Reasoning: The judge found that the prosecution's own witnesses—including the complainant (PW1) and all 7 eyewitnesses (PW2-PW8)—completely contradicted the charge sheet by testifying that no incident occurred, they sustained no injuries, and they had no knowledge of any altercation. With all prosecution witnesses turning hostile and providing no corroborating evidence, the judge concluded the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Shekhargouda & Others (SC.No.5204/2025) Court Decision: All 10 accused persons were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 448, 427, 307, 504 read with 149 (unlawful assembly, rioting, house trespass, mischief, attempt to murder, and criminal intimidation). Key Reasoning: The judge found that the prosecution's own witnesses—including the complainant (PW1) and all 7 eyewitnesses (PW2-PW8)—completely contradicted the charge sheet by testifying that no incident occurred, they sustained no injuries, and they had no knowledge of any altercation. With all prosecution witnesses turning hostile and providing no corroborating evidence, the judge concluded the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →Explore other courts