Kembhavi P.S. vs Bhimanna — 5199/2025
Case under Sec of Ipc Section Under,Section,143,147,323,324,307,498(A),504,R,W,149IPC. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAYG320005032025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5199/2025
Filing Date
19-11-2019
Registration No
5199/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2019
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
0081
Police Station
KEMBHAVI PS
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kembhavi P.S.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Bhimanna
Devakamma
Gangamma
Shantamma
Mallamma
Basamma
Renuka
Sharanamma
Mounesh
Mallanna
Hearing History
Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir acquitted all 10 accused persons of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, assault, attempt to murder, cruelty, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 307, 498(A), 504, 506 read with 149. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt as the complainant (PW1) testified that no such incident occurred and the examined witnesses turned hostile, providing no credible evidence supporting the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir acquitted all 10 accused persons of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, assault, attempt to murder, cruelty, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 307, 498(A), 504, 506 read with 149. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt as the complainant (PW1) testified that no such incident occurred and the examined witnesses turned hostile, providing no credible evidence supporting the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →Explore other courts