Ninganna S/o Hanamanthapa Bevinahalli, Occ Legal practitioner and Agri, vs Anjanaya died by LRs1. — 5059/2025
Case under Sec 374 of Cr.pc Section Us,138,of,NI,Act. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th April 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAYG320005022025
Filing Number
5059/2025
Filing Date
25-01-2021
Registration No
5059/2025
Registration Date
27-01-2021
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ninganna S/o Hanamanthapa Bevinahalli, Occ Legal practitioner and Agri,
Adv. SANTOSH MAHEDRAKAR
Respondent(s)
Anjanaya died by LRs1.
Laxmi W/o Anjanaya Undavali, Occ House hold 1.
Naga Geetanjalli D/o Anjanaya Undavali, Occ Student 1.
Sanjana D/o Anjanaya Undavali, Occ Student, 1.
Cahendrawati W/o Nageshwarrao, Occ House hold, 1.
Venkatkumar S/o Anjanaya Undavali, Occ Student
Hearing History
Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 5059/2025 The appellate court ACQUITTED accused Ninganna of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove existence of legally recoverable debt and financial capacity to advance ₹9,99,900/-. The court determined the accused successfully rebutted statutory presumptions by establishing the complainant was a migrant agricultural laborer from Andhra Pradesh without documented income sources or lease deeds, making the alleged loan implausible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 5059/2025 The appellate court ACQUITTED accused Ninganna of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove existence of legally recoverable debt and financial capacity to advance ₹9,99,900/-. The court determined the accused successfully rebutted statutory presumptions by establishing the complainant was a migrant agricultural laborer from Andhra Pradesh without documented income sources or lease deeds, making the alleged loan implausible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →Explore other courts