Avvamma W/o Siddalingayya Hiremath vs Revanasiddayya S/o Paramayya Hiremath — 5017/2025

Case under Sec 397 of Cr.pc Section U/s,138,and,142,NI,Act. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS

CNR: KAYG320004172025

Filing Number

5017/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2022

Registration No

5017/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2022

Court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR

Judge

1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec 397 of Cr.pc Section U/s,138,and,142,NI,Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Avvamma W/o Siddalingayya Hiremath

    Adv. H M Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Revanasiddayya S/o Paramayya Hiremath

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Summary: The II Additional District and Sessions Court, Yadgir dismissed the revision petition filed by accused Revanasiddayya challenging the trial court's rejection of his application to recall the complainant witness for further cross-examination under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found no genuine grounds for recall, noting that the accused's counsel had already conducted a thorough cross-examination spanning 4 pages and adequately covered all defense points. The court confirmed the trial court's order, holding that witnesses cannot be recalled merely due to incomplete prior cross-examination and that further cross is essential only when necessary for just case decision, which was not established here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders-Criminal

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  5. 19-May-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Call for records

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  18. 17-Sep-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  19. 28-Aug-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  20. 31-Jul-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  22. 04-Jul-2025

    Notice

    II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 03-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5017/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The II Additional District and Sessions Court, Yadgir dismissed the revision petition filed by accused Revanasiddayya challenging the trial court's rejection of his application to recall the complainant witness for further cross-examination under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found no genuine grounds for recall, noting that the accused's counsel had already conducted a thorough cross-examination spanning 4 pages and adequately covered all defense points. The court confirmed the trial court's order, holding that witnesses cannot be recalled merely due to incomplete prior cross-examination and that further cross is essential only when necessary for just case decision, which was not established here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case