The State of Karnataka Shorapur PS vs Chandappa @ Chandrappa S/o Ayyappa Hirimidi Age 40 Yrs,Occ Driver — 5133/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.448,376,504,506,of,IPC. Status: Evidence-Criminal. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAYG320003842025
Filing Number
5133/2025
Filing Date
18-Jun-2024
Registration No
5133/2025
Registration Date
18-Jun-2024
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0003
Police Station
SHORAPUR PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Karnataka Shorapur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandappa @ Chandrappa S/o Ayyappa Hirimidi Age 40 Yrs,Occ Driver
Case History
-
27-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-May-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
30-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: SC No. 5133/2025 This is a trial proceeding before the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Yadagiri against accused Chandappa (age 40, driver). Witness Kumar Nayak was examined on 30.01.2026. During examination-in-chief, the witness testified to identifying photos and signatures but claimed ignorance of document contents and stated no panchanama was conducted in his presence. The Public Prosecutor declared him hostile. During cross-examination by the prosecutor, the witness denied prior testimony, clarifying that police did call him as panch on 06.01.2024 for spot panchanama and again on 09.01.2024 for seizure panchanama at Shorapur PS, where 10 articles were seized with proper signatures. The accused's counsel waived cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence-Criminal
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
07-Aug-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
25-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
07-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
23-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 5133/2025
Case Summary: SC No. 5133/2025 This is a trial proceeding before the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Yadagiri against accused Chandappa (age 40, driver). Witness Kumar Nayak was examined on 30.01.2026. During examination-in-chief, the witness testified to identifying photos and signatures but claimed ignorance of document contents and stated no panchanama was conducted in his presence. The Public Prosecutor declared him hostile. During cross-examination by the prosecutor, the witness denied prior testimony, clarifying that police did call him as panch on 06.01.2024 for spot panchanama and again on 09.01.2024 for seizure panchanama at Shorapur PS, where 10 articles were seized with proper signatures. The accused's counsel waived cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts