Ashappa S/o Late Mallanan Chamanal Age 62 Yrs,Occ Agri vs laxmibai W/o Nagappa Badigera Age 54 Yrs, Occ HH — 5037/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: Arguments-CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAYG320001882025
Filing Number
5037/2025
Filing Date
20-Apr-2024
Registration No
5037/2025
Registration Date
22-Apr-2024
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashappa S/o Late Mallanan Chamanal Age 62 Yrs,Occ Agri
Adv. Snatosh Mahendrakar
-
2.Bhimabai W/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 54 Yrs,Occ HH
-
3.Shridhar S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 32 Yrs, Occ Agri
-
4.Shashidar S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 30 Yrs Occ Student
-
5.Mallikarjun S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 28 Yrs, Occ Student
-
6.Parashuram S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 24 Yrs,Occ Student
Respondent(s)
-
1.laxmibai W/o Nagappa Badigera Age 54 Yrs, Occ HH
-
2.Mallamma W/o Nagappa Badigera Age 52 Yrs Occ HH
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
17-Jan-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
03-Jan-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
10-Dec-2025
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
20-Nov-2025
Arguments-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
05-Nov-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary The court dismissed all three interim applications (IA Nos. I to III) filed by the defendants/appellants seeking to amend their written statement and introduce additional evidence during appeal. The judge held that the defendants had already admitted key facts in their original written statement (that plaintiffs and defendants are related joint family members), and therefore could not later amend their pleading to contradict these admissions and deprive plaintiffs of their accrued legal rights to property shares. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Nov-2025
Orders-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
04-Nov-2025
Orders-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
03-Nov-2025
Orders-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
27-Oct-2025
Orders-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
10-Oct-2025
Orders-CIVIL
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
20-Sep-2025
Hearing
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
13-Aug-2025
Hearing
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
28-Jul-2025
Summons
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
16-Jul-2025
Summons
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
14-Jul-2025
Summons
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
07-Jul-2025
Summons
II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
-
18-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 5037/2025
Case Summary The court dismissed all three interim applications (IA Nos. I to III) filed by the defendants/appellants seeking to amend their written statement and introduce additional evidence during appeal. The judge held that the defendants had already admitted key facts in their original written statement (that plaintiffs and defendants are related joint family members), and therefore could not later amend their pleading to contradict these admissions and deprive plaintiffs of their accrued legal rights to property shares. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts