Ashappa S/o Late Mallanan Chamanal Age 62 Yrs,Occ Agri vs laxmibai W/o Nagappa Badigera Age 54 Yrs, Occ HH — 5037/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAYG320001882025

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5037/2025

Filing Date

20-04-2024

Registration No

5037/2025

Registration Date

22-04-2024

Court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR

Judge

1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

Ashappa S/o Late Mallanan Chamanal Age 62 Yrs,Occ Agri

Adv. Snatosh Mahendrakar

Bhimabai W/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 54 Yrs,Occ HH

Shridhar S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 32 Yrs, Occ Agri

Shashidar S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 30 Yrs Occ Student

Mallikarjun S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 28 Yrs, Occ Student

Parashuram S/o Ashappa Chamanal Age 24 Yrs,Occ Student

Respondent(s)

laxmibai W/o Nagappa Badigera Age 54 Yrs, Occ HH

Mallamma W/o Nagappa Badigera Age 52 Yrs Occ HH

Hearing History

Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur

25-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

25-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

07-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

17-01-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Interim Orders

05-11-2025
Orders

Case Summary The court dismissed all three interim applications (IA Nos. I to III) filed by the defendants/appellants seeking to amend their written statement and introduce additional evidence during appeal. The judge held that the defendants had already admitted key facts in their original written statement (that plaintiffs and defendants are related joint family members), and therefore could not later amend their pleading to contradict these admissions and deprive plaintiffs of their accrued legal rights to property shares. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed all three interim applications (IA Nos. I to III) filed by the defendants/appellants seeking to amend their written statement and introduce additional evidence during appeal. The judge held that the defendants had already admitted key facts in their original written statement (that plaintiffs and defendants are related joint family members), and therefore could not later amend their pleading to contradict these admissions and deprive plaintiffs of their accrued legal rights to property shares. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case