Kembhavi PS vs Sharanagouda S/o Dyavayya Guttedar, Age 39 Yrs, Occ Driver — 5089/2025
Case under Sec of Ipc Section Us,341,302,109,Rw,34,of,IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAYG320001342025
Filing Number
5089/2025
Filing Date
23-03-2021
Registration No
5089/2025
Registration Date
23-03-2021
Court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR
Judge
1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0176
Police Station
KEMBHAVI PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kembhavi PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Sharanagouda S/o Dyavayya Guttedar, Age 39 Yrs, Occ Driver
Vithal S/o Dyavayya Guttedar, Age 29 Yrs, Occ Agri
Prakash S/o Shivayya @ Shivaraj Guttedar, Age 23 Yrs, Occ Agri
Hearing History
Judge: 1569-II Addl District & Sessions Judge Yadgir Sitting at Shorapur
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SC.No.5089/2025 Court Decision: All three accused (Sharanagouda, Vithal, and Prakash Guttedar) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 302 (murder), and 109 (abetment) with Section 34 (common intention). Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses, including the complainant (widow of deceased Rangayya), testified that the death resulted from an accident rather than the alleged coordinated attack. All prosecution witnesses either denied knowledge of the incident or stated they had given no police statements, undermining the case. The court determined the prosecution failed to prove any element of the alleged offences beyond reasonable doubt, with all witnesses turning hostile to the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SC.No.5089/2025 Court Decision: All three accused (Sharanagouda, Vithal, and Prakash Guttedar) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 302 (murder), and 109 (abetment) with Section 34 (common intention). Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses, including the complainant (widow of deceased Rangayya), testified that the death resulted from an accident rather than the alleged coordinated attack. All prosecution witnesses either denied knowledge of the incident or stated they had given no police statements, undermining the case. The court determined the prosecution failed to prove any element of the alleged offences beyond reasonable doubt, with all witnesses turning hostile to the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR TO SIT AT SHORAPUR All courts →Explore other courts